Chap 32: Last Days
- The new edition of the Theory was Smith’s last published work.
- A French newspaper, the Moniteur Universelle of Paris, announced on March 11, 1790 that Smith would do a critical examination of Montesquieu’s Esprit des Lois.
- It predicted that the work would make an epoch in the history of politics and of philosophy.
- It said, that at least, is the judgment of well-informed people who have seen parts of it, of which they speak with an enthusiasm of the happiest augury.
- But the announcement was not made on any good authority.
- Smith may probably enough have dealt with Montesquieu as he dealt with many other topics in the papers he had prepared towards his projected work on government.
- But there is no evidence that he ever intended to publish a separate work on Montesquieu.
- Before March 1790, his strength seems to have been much wasted.
- The Earl of Buchan was in town in February and visited him.
- Upon leaving Smith, the Earl said:
- “My dear Doctor, I hope to see you oftener when I come to town next February,”
- But Smith squeezed his lordship’s hand and replied, “My dear Lord Buchan,[365] I may be alive then [Pg 432]and perhaps half a dozen Februaries, but you never will see your old friend any more.
- I find that the machine is breaking down, so that I shall be little better than a mummy”
- —with a by-thought possibly to the mummies of Toulouse.
- The Earl adds:
- “I wanted to visit Smith in his last illness,
- but the mummy stared me in the face and I was intimidated.”[366]
- Upon leaving Smith, the Earl said:
- During the spring months, Smith got worse and weaker.
- Though he seemed to rally at the first approach of the warm weather.
- He sank at length again in June.
- His condition seemed hopeless to his friends.
- Long and painful as his illness was, he bore it with patience and a serene and even cheerful resignation.
- On June 21, Henry Mackenzie wrote his brother-in-law, Sir J. Grant, that Edinburgh had just lost its finest woman, the beautiful Miss Burnet of Monboddo.
- Burns called her “the most heavenly of all God’s works.”
-
- In a few weeks, it would in all probability lose its greatest man, Adam Smith.
- “He is now past all hopes of recovery, with which about three weeks ago we had flattered ourselves.” (Mackenzie)
- A week later, Smellie the printer, wrote Smith’s young friend, Patrick Clason, in London:
- “Poor Smith! we must soon lose him.
- The moment he leaves will give a heart-pang to thousands.
- Mr. Smith’s spirits are flat.
- I am afraid his exertions to please his friends do him no good.
- His intellect and senses are clear and distinct.
- He wishes to be cheerful, but nature is omnipotent.
- His body is extremely emaciated.
- His stomach cannot admit of sufficient nourishment.
- But, like a man, he is perfectly patient and resigned.”[367]
- In all his weakness, he was still thoughtful of the care of his friends.
- “In many respects, Adam Smith was a chaste disciple of Epicurus.
- Smith’s last act resembled that of Epicurus leaving as a legacy to his friend and patron the children of his Metrodorus, the excellent Cullen.”[368] (Lord Buchan)
- Smith’s old friend Adam Ferguson had been apparently estranged from Smith for some time.
- When it became evident that the sickness was mortal, he immediately forgot their coolness, whatever it was about.
- He came and waited on him with the old affection.
- On July 31, 1790, Ferguson writes the death to Sir John Macpherson.
- Macpherson was Warren Hastings’ successor as Governor-General of India.
- “Your old friend Smith is no more.”
-
- We knew he was dying for some months.
- Matters were a little awkward when he was in health.
- After seeing him, I went to him immediately and continued my attentions to the last.”[369]
- Dr. Carlyle mentions that:
- the Edinburgh literary circle’s harmony of the 18th century was often ruffled by little tifts, and
- Dr. Carlyle and John Home were generally called in to compose them.
- the usual source of the trouble was Ferguson’s “great jealousy of rivals,” and especially of Hume, Smith, and Robertson.
- the Edinburgh literary circle’s harmony of the 18th century was often ruffled by little tifts, and
- But it would not be right to ascribe the fault to Ferguson merely on that account,
- for Carlyle hints that Smith too had “a little jealousy in his nature,”
- although he admits him to have been a man of “unbounded benevolence.”
- But whatever had come between them, it is pleasant to find Ferguson:
- When Smith felt his end to be approaching, he evinced great anxiety to have all his papers destroyed except the few which he judged to be ready for publication.
- Too feeble to do it himself, he repeatedly begged his friends Black and Hutton to destroy them for him.
- A third friend, Mr. Riddell, was present on one of the occasions when this request was made.
- He mentions that Smith regretted that:
- “he had done so little.”
- “But I meant to have done more.
- There are materials in my papers of which I could have made a great deal, but that is now out of the question.”[370]
- He mentions that Smith regretted that:
- Black and Hutton always put off complying with Smith’s requests in the hope of his recovering his health or perhaps changing his mind.
- But a week before his death, he expressly sent for them.
- He asked them then and there to burn 16 volumes of manuscript to which he directed them.
- This they did without knowing or asking what they contained.
- 17 years before, he went to London with the manuscript of the Wealth of Nations.
- He made Hume his literary executor.
- He left instructions with Hume to:
- destroy all his loose papers and 18 thin paper folio books “without any examination,” and
- spare nothing but his fragment on the history of astronomy.
- When the 16 volumes of manuscript were burnt, Smith’s mind seemed to be greatly relieved.
- It appears to have been on a Sunday.
- His friends came on the evening to supper.
- They seem to have mustered strongly on this particular evening.
- He was able to receive them with something of his usual cheerfulness.
- He would even have stayed up and sat with them had they allowed him.
- As he left the room, he turned and said:
- “I love your company, gentlemen.
- But I believe I must leave you to go to another world.”
- These are the words as reported by Henry Mackenzie, who was present.
- He gave Samuel Rogers an account of Smith’s death during his visit to London in the following year.[371]
- Hutton gave a slightly different expression in his account to Stewart:
- “I believe we must adjourn this meeting to some other place.”
- Possibly both sentences were used by Smith.
- For both are needed for the complete expression of the parting consolation he obviously meant to convey—that death is not a final separation, but only an adjournment of the meeting.
- That was his last meeting with them in the earthly meeting-place.
- He had gone to the other world before the next Sunday came.
- He died on Saturday July 17, 1790.
- He was buried in the Canongate churchyard:
- near the simple stone which Burns placed on Fergusson’s grave, and
- not far from the statelier tomb which later on received the remains of Dugald Stewart.
- The grave is marked by an unpretending monument.
- It states that Adam Smith, the author of the Wealth of Nations, lies buried there.
- His death made less stir or rumour in the world than many of his admirers expected.
- For example, Sir Samuel Romilly wrote on August 20 to a French lady who had wanted a copy of the new edition of the Theory of Moral Sentiments.
- He says: “I have been surprised and am a little indignant how little impression his death has made here.
- It has been scarcely noticed.
- While for more than a year after Dr. Johnson’s death, only panegyrics of him was to be heard: lives, letters, and anecdotes.
- Even at this moment, there are two more lives of him to start into existence.
- [Pg 436] One should not be very much surprised that the public does not do justice to Smith’s works, since he did not do justice to them himself.
- He always considered his Theory of Moral Sentiments a much superior work to his Wealth of Nations.”[372]
- Even in Edinburgh, it seemed to make less impression than the death of a bustling divine.
- It was certainly less than the death of the excellent but far less illustrious Dugald Stewart a generation later.
- The newspapers had his obituary in two small paragraphs.
- The only facts the writers were able to find were:
- his early abduction by the gypsies, and
- The Mercury and the Advertiser give a circumstantial account of this
- that “Dr. Smith in private life was distinguished for philanthropy, benevolence, humanity, and charity.” (the Advertiser)
- his early abduction by the gypsies, and
- The only facts the writers were able to find were:
- Lord Cockburn was then beginning to read and think, was struck with the general ignorance of Smith’s merits which his fellow-citizens exhibited shortly after his death.
- “The middle-aged seemed to me to know little about the founder of the science (political economy) except that he had recently:
- been a Commissioner of Customs and
- written a sensible book.
- The Liberal young of Edinburgh lived upon him.”[373]
- “The middle-aged seemed to me to know little about the founder of the science (political economy) except that he had recently:
- Stewart was no sooner dead than a monument was raised to him on one of the best sites in the city.
- The greater name of Smith has to this day no public monument in the city he so long adorned.
- Black and Hutton were his literary executors.
- In 1795, they published the literary fragments which had been spared from the flames.
- His will was dated February 6, 1790.
- He left his whole property to his cousin, David Douglas, afterwards Lord Reston.
- It is subject to the condition that:
- the legatee should follow the instructions of Black and Hutton in disposing of the MSS. and writings, and [Pg 437]
- pay an annuity of £20 a year to Mrs. Janet Douglas, and after her death, £400 to Professor Hugh Cleghorn of St. Andrews and his wife.[374]
- However, the property Smith left was very moderate.
- His friends were surprised that it should have been so little.
- Because he only maintained a moderate establishment.
- But they had not known that he gave away large sums in secret charity.
- William Playfair says that Smith’s friends suspected him of doing this.
- They sometimes formed special juries to discovering evidences of it during his lifetime.
- But Smith was “so ingenious in concealing his charity” that they never could discover it from witnesses,
- Though they often found the strongest circumstantial evidence of it.[375]
- Dugald Stewart was more fortunate.
- Miss Ross was the daughter of the late Patrick Ross, Esq., of Innernethy.
- Patrick Ross was one of Smith’s most confidential friends.
- Miss Ross mentioned to Stewart of Smith’s beneficence when he could not hide his generosity.
- His generosity was much beyond what would have been expected from his fortune.
- It was combined with circumstances equally honourable to:
- the delicacy of his feelings and
- the liberality of his heart.
- Miss Ross was the daughter of the late Patrick Ross, Esq., of Innernethy.
- Sir James Mackintosh was a student of Cullen and Black’s in Smith’s closing years.
- He used to meet Smith in private society occasionally.
- Many years after this, he said to Empson:
- “I have known Adam Smith slightly, Ricardo well, and Malthus intimately.
- Is it not something to say for a science that its three greatest masters were about the three best men I ever knew?”[376]
- Smith never sat for his picture.
- Nevertheless, has has two excellent portraits by two very talented artists who had many opportunities of seeing and sketching him.
- Tassie was a student at Foulis’s Academy of Design in Glasgow College when Smith was there.
- He might have even modeled Smith then.
- For we hear of Smith’s models being in all the booksellers’ windows in Glasgow at that time.
- These models would have been made in the Academy of Design.
- Tassie created two different medallions of Smith in later days.
- Raspe wrote a catalogue of Tassie’s enamels.
-
-
-
-
- It has the same date as the former.
- It appears never to have been engraved.
-
-
- Raspe mentions a third medallion of Smith [Pg 439]of Tassie’s:
- “an enamel bust in chalcedony colour, engraved by F. Warner, after a model by J. Tassie.”
- But this appears from Mr. Gray’s account to be a reduced version of the first of the two just mentioned.
-
-
- He describes one of the largest as being modelled and cast by Tassie in his hard white enamel paste.
- It resembles a cameo.
- From this model J. Jackson, R.A., made a drawing.
- It was engraved in stipple by C. Picart.
- It was published in 1811 by Cadell and Davies.
- Line engravings of the same model were subsequently made by John Horsburgh and R.C. Bell for successive editions of the Wealth of Nations.
- It is accordingly Smith’s best portrait and the best known .
- It is a profile bust showing handsome features:
- full forehead,
- prominent eyeballs,
- well curved eyebrows,
- slightly aquiline nose, and
- firm mouth and chin.
- It is inscribed, “Adam Smith in his 64th year, 1787. Tassie F.”
- In this medallion, Smith wears a wig.
- Mr. J.M. Gray tells us that:
- Tassie executed another in “the antique manner:”
- without the wig, and
- with neck and breast bare.
- “It shows the rounded form of the head, covered with curling hair and curving upwards from the brow to a point above the large ear, which is hidden in the other version.”[377] (Mr. Gray)
- Tassie executed another in “the antique manner:”
- He describes one of the largest as being modelled and cast by Tassie in his hard white enamel paste.
- Kay made two portraits of Smith.
- The first was done in 1787.
- It represents him as he walked in the street.
- The second was issued in 1790.
- It represented him as he has entered an office, probably the Custom House.
- The first was done in 1787.
- There is a painting by T. Collopy in the National Museum of Antiquities at Edinburgh.
- It is thought to be Adam Smith’s portrait because the title Wealth of Nations appears on the back of a book on the table in the picture.
- But Stewart very explicitly says that Smith never sat for his portrait, so it is very doubtful.
- All other likenesses of Smith are founded on those of Tassie and Kay.
- Smith was:
- of middle height,
- full but not corpulent,
- with erect figure,
- well-set head, and
- large gray or light blue eyes.
- They beamed with “inexpressible benignity.”
- He dressed so well that nobody seems to have remarked it.
- While we hear of:
- Hume’s black-spotted yellow coat,
- Gibbon’s flowered velvet,
- Hutton’s battered attire,
- Henry Erskine’s gray hat with the torn rim.
- But there is no allusion to Smith’s dress for fault or merit.
- Smith was:
- Smith’s books which went to his heir, Lord Reston, were divided.
- On Lord Reston’s death, they were divided between his two daughters.
- The economic books went to Mrs. Bannerman, the wife of the late Professor Bannerman of Edinburgh
- The works on other subjects went to Mrs. Cunningham, wife of the Rev. Mr. Cunningham of Prestonpans.
- Both portions still exist.
- The former in the Library of the New College, Edinburgh, to which they have been presented by Dr. D. Douglas Bannerman of Perth; and
- The latter is with Professor Cunningham of[Pg 440] Queen’s College, Belfast, except:
- a few which were sold in Edinburgh in 1878, and
- a section, consisting almost exclusively of Greek and Latin classics, which Professor Cunningham has presented to the library of the college of which he is a member.
- Among other relics of Smith that are still extant are four medallions by Tassie, which very probably hung in his library.
- They are medallions of his personal friends:
- Black, the chemist;
- Hutton, the geologist;
- Dr. Thomas Reid, the metaphysician; and
- Andrew Lumisden, the Pretender’s old secretary, and author of the work on Roman antiquities.
FOOTNOTES:
[365] Ascanius was the Earl’s pseudonym.
[366] The Bee, 1791, iii. 166.
[367] Kerr’s Memoirs of W. Smellie, i. 295.
[368] The Bee, 1791, iii. 167.
[369] Original letter in Edinburgh University Library.
[370] Stewart’s Works, x. 74.
[371] Clayden’s Early Life of Samuel Rogers, p. 168.
[372]Memoirs of Sir Samuel Romilly, i. 403.
[373] Cockburn’s Memorials of My Own Time, p. 45.
[374] Bonar’s Library of Adam Smith, p. xiv.
[375] Playfair’s edition of Wealth of Nations, p. xxxiv.
[376]Edinburgh Review, January 1837, p. 473.
[377] Bonar’s Library of Adam Smith, p. xxii.
Words: 2,735