Grounds of the Suspicion that the Value of Silver still continues to decrease
190 People believe that the value of silver still continues to fall in Europe because of:
- the increase of European wealth, and
- the popular notion that the value of precious metals diminishes because their quantity rises with the rising wealth.
The increasing price of most rude produce may confirm them this opinion further.
191 I have shown that the increase in the amount of gold and silver from the increase of wealth does not reduce their value.
- Gold and silver naturally resort to a rich country just as all luxuries resort to it.
- It is because they become dearer or because a better price is given for them, and not because they become cheaper.
- It is the superiority of price which attracts them.
- When that superiority ceases, they necessarily cease to go there.
192 I have shown that all non-plant rude produce: cattle, poultry, game, fossil fuels, minerals, etc. naturally grow dearer as the society advances in wealth and improvement.
- Such commodities are worth more silver than before.
- But it will not follow that silver has become cheaper.
- It means such commodities have really become dearer.
- Both their nominal and real price rises in the progress of improvement.
- The rise of their nominal price is the effect of the rise in their real price.
Different Effects of Improvement on the real price of three Kinds of rude Produce
193 Rude produce may be divided into three:
- The ones that human industry cannot multiply at all
- Its real price may rise to any degree.
- The ones that human industry can multiply in proportion to the demand.
- Its real price may rise to a certain boundary.
- The ones that human industry can multiply in a limited or uncertain way.
- Its real price varies according to the efforts of human industry.
1. Rude Produce Whose Price Rises With Improvement
194 The first kind is the rude produce which human industry cannot multiply at all.
- Examples are:
- most rare birds and fishes,
- different sorts of game, and
- almost all wild-fowl and all birds of passage, etc.
- Nature produces them only in certain quantities.
- They are very perishable.
- It is impossible to accumulate together such produce of different seasons.
- Their demand increases with the increase in wealth and luxury.
- Their supply cannot increase beyond this increase of the demand.
- The quantity of such commodities remain the same while the competition to purchase them is continually increasing
- Their price may rise to any unlimited height.
- If the demand for woodcocks rose and its price increased to 20 guineas each, their supply cannot be increased.
- The Romans paid a high price for rare birds and fishes.
- These prices were the effect of the high value of such rarities and not the effects of the low value of silver.
- The real value of silver was higher at Rome then than at present.
- 3 sestertii, equal to 6 pence sterling, was the price for the modius or peck of the tithe wheat of Sicily.
- This price was probably below the average market price.
- The obligation to deliver wheat at this price was considered as a tax on the Sicilian farmers.
- When the Romans ordered more corn than the tithe of wheat amounted to, they were bound to pay for the surplus at the rate of 4 sestertii, or 8-pence sterling the peck.
- This was probably the average contract price of those times.
- It is equal to 252 pence the quarter.
- 336 pence the quarter was the ordinary contract price of English wheat.
- English wheat has inferior quality to Sicilian wheat.
- It sells for a lower price in Europe.
- The value of silver in those ancient times was 3:4 of today.
- Three ounces of silver then bought the same amount of labour and commodities which four ounces do presently.
- According to Pliny, Seius bought a white nightingale for the empress Agrippina at 6,000 sestertii or nominal 12,000 pence today.
- Asinius Celer purchased a surmullet at 8,000 sestertii, equal to nominal 16,000 pence today.
- The extravagance of those prices is about 1/3 less than it really was.
- Their real price was around 1/3 more than their nominal price relative to today.
- Seius gave for the nightingale the command of an amount of labour and subsistence equal to what 16,000 pence would buy today. [12,000 + (12,000/3)]
- Asinius Celer paid 21,333.33 pence, real value, for the surmullet. [16,000 + (16,000/3)]
- Those high prices were due to the abundance of labour and subsistence that the Romans had beyond what was necessary for their own use.
- They had less silver then than today.
For comments or corrections, please email firstname.lastname@example.org